Processing...
Processing...
Inmagic
®
Presto
Version 5.5 Build 151
Inmagic
®
Presto
Copyright © 2005-2021 by Lucidea Technologies Corp., Richmond BC Canada. All rights reserved.
Inmagic® and the Inmagic logo are registered trademarks of Lucidea Technologies Corp.
Unauthorized duplication or distribution is prohibited.
Other brand and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders. Use of any other product name does not imply endorsement of that product by Inmagic.
Third-party Licenses
Processing...
Processing...
Title
Total friction management on Canadian Pacific
Author
Roney, M
Eadie, DT
Oldknow, K
Sroba, P
Caldwell, R
Santoro, M
Affiliation
Canadian Pacific Railway, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Kelsan Technologies Corp, North Vancouver, BC, Canada
National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Portec Rail Products Ltd, Quebec, Canada
Publication Date
2009
Conference
9th International Heavy Haul Conference (IHHC 2009), Shanghai, China, 22-25 June, 2009
Abstract
Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) has been a leader in implementation of new friction control technology. Following earlier trials, we report the design, justification, roll out and early results of Total Friction Management (TFM) (GF plus TOR) over all high tonnage lines in Western Canada. Tools and processes needed for implementing TFM over a large territory are described. The roll out incorporates state of the art equipment and materials for GF and TOR application , logistics considerations for material handling, and maintenance issues through dedicated TFM staff. Development of a holistic economic case for this TFM project is discussed. Prior results were used to quantify expected savings in rail, ties, and track regauging. Wheel replacement savings were estimated. Locomotive fuel savings were projected by model. Together with the appropriate costs, the expected savings were used to develop an overall business case. TFM implementation involves installation of 325 TOR wayside applicators over 923 route miles between Calgary to Vancouver, as well as optimization and upgrade of 216 wayside GF units. Remote PeIformance Monitoring is used to manage unit maintenance. Performance verification includes use of L/V sites for TOR effectiveness, and regular high speed tribometer runs to validate and optimize GF performance. Monitoring of the project to date indicate fuel savings (> 5% ) well in excess of those used to justify the project.
File - click thumbnail to download
Physical Description
pp. 846-854 ; PDF
Subjects
Railway track
Modelling
Friction
Cost effectiveness
Cost benefit analysis
Logistics
Maintenance costs
Rail transport
Rolling contact
Location
Server
ARRB library
Category
Rail Knowledge Bank Index
Infrastructure
Wheel/rail interaction
Rail Knowledge Bank Index
Infrastructure
Track
Permalink
https://railknowledgebank.com/Presto/pl/MTk4MTRjNDUtNWQ0My00OTBmLTllYWUtZWFjM2U2OTE0ZDY3LjI2MDk=